Lies

I didn't read either of these all the way through, but enough to get the point. Each person is pointing out where their political opposition lied. What have I learned? Like statistics, you can use rhetoric to prove anything. If I had to pick a more trustworthy author, it would have to be Franken just because his own lies seem 'subjective', where as Coulter's own lies seems to be actually false. Furthermore, Franken seems to at least sorta try to convince the other side; vs. Coulter's book seems designed to reaffirm conservatives' beliefs rather than speak to liberals. It's too bad we can't take them to court or something. Franken points out a lot of Coulter's lies in his book and this <a href="http://frankenlies.com|img=none">site</a> points out a lot of Fraken's lies.

---